Status report

Get it in writing

The official USPTO status record for PETAL, serial 71413698, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.

INSTANT DELIVERY

Trademark Status Report

$7.99

The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.

  • Current status with a plain-English verdict
  • Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
  • The mark as it appears on the federal record
  • Every prosecution event, filing to today
  • Source-cited with the exact retrieval date

Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.

Payments launch soon. Leave your email and we'll tell you when this report is available.

Searching stays free, no account, no caps.

Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
PETAL
Serial 71413698 · Principal Register
Dead · Expired

Owner: BAKER INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
Class 007 -
Filed Dec 12, 1938
Registered May 16, 1939

The record shows that the mark “PETAL” was once registered on the Principal Register but is now dead because the owner, BAKER INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, did not renew it. The registration covered well‑drilling tools and equipment, specifically basket structures used during cementing operations, and the mark was first used in commerce on June 1, 1937. Because the goods are highly specific to the oil and gas drilling industry, a similar name used for unrelated products would raise a much weaker concern, but the record still indicates that the wording was once protected in that particular field. The latest maintenance event was the cancellation on December 23, 2000, after the mark had already expired. No oppositions, cancellations, or court actions appear in the supplied history, so the record shows no visible enforcement activity. For someone looking to use a similar name, the closest concern would be in the drilling‑equipment sector, and the mark’s expiration means the name is no longer protected, though the earlier registration could still be a factor in a similarity analysis.

Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.

The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.

Your name deserves a straight answer.

Search the federal register free. No account, no caps, no waiting around.

Run a free trademark search