Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for BEAUTY GUARD, serial 72181652, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
BEAUTY GUARDSerial 72181652 · Principal Register
Dead · Expired
Owner: LINCOLN METAL PRODUCTS CORPORATION
Class 020 -
Filed Nov 21, 1963
Registered Oct 19, 1965
The record shows that the mark “BEAUTY GUARD” is no longer active; it was registered on October 19, 1965, but the owner, Lincoln Metal Products Corporation, failed to renew it, and the registration expired on January 19, 1986. The mark was held on the Principal Register for class 020, covering a transparent plastic protective sheet applied to bread boxes, paper, and aluminum foil dispensers and step‑on garbage cans. Because the goods are specific to protective packaging, a similar name used for unrelated products would present a farther concern, while a name used for similar packaging would raise the closest concern. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the words “beauty” or “guard.” No enforcement actions, oppositions, or cancellations appear in the supplied history. The last meaningful event was the expiration in 1986. For someone considering a similar name, the expired status means the mark no longer protects the wording, but the specific packaging context still represents a potential area of concern.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.