Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for IN-V-VOTRON, serial 72345195, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
IN-V-VOTRONSerial 72345195 · Principal Register
Dead · Expired
Owner: NUCLEAR SYSTEMS, INC.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Filed Dec 03, 1969
Registered Sep 21, 1971
The record shows that IN‑V‑VOTRON is a dead Principal Register registration owned by NUCLEAR SYSTEMS, INC., and it expired because the required renewal was not filed, with the status date listed as November 4 1992. The registration covered a very specific scientific apparatus in International Class 009 – a laboratory radiation‑monitoring instrument that includes a single‑channel analyzer, scintillation detector amplifier, electronic timer, high‑speed scaler and an ultra‑stable high‑voltage power supply for detecting, analyzing and counting gamma rays. Because the claim is limited to that detailed equipment, a similar name used for unrelated products would be a farther concern, while a name applied to comparable radiation‑monitoring devices would be the closest record‑based overlap. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the wording in any field. No supplemental‑register filing appears, and the only notable event is the expiration notice in 1992; the history shows no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to market a comparable radiation‑monitoring instrument under a similar name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.