Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for NIKE, serial 72384625, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
NIKESerial 72384625 · Principal Register
Dead · Expired
Owner: DOMKRAFTAKTIEBOLAGET NIKE
Class 007 -
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 020 -
Filed Feb 23, 1971
Registered Aug 14, 1973
This record shows that the mark “NIKE” is no longer live; it expired on May 23 1994 and is listed as dead. The owner was DOMKRAFTAKTIEBOLAGET NIKE, a corporation organized in Sweden. The mark was registered on August 14 1973 for three classes: mechanical and hydraulic lifting equipment, paper goods and printed matter, and barber chairs. A similar name would raise the closest concern in those specific goods—lifting jacks, hydraulic presses, drafting tables, and barber chairs—rather than in unrelated categories. The record does not give the mark control over every use of the word “NIKE.” The prosecution history shows the mark was accepted under Section 8 and later expired under Section 9; no Supplemental Register activity is involved. No enforcement actions, oppositions, or cancellations appear in the supplied history. For someone considering a similar name, the main risk lies in the narrow, now‑expired classes listed, and the mark’s dead status means there is no current active protection.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.