Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for DIANE LOVE, serial 73202107, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
DIANE LOVESerial 73202107 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: Diane Love, Inc.
Class 018 -
Class 021 -
Class 026 -
Class 031 -
Filed Jan 31, 1979
Registered Apr 21, 1981
The record shows that the mark DIANE LOVE is cancelled; the registration was cancelled on Oct 22 1987 because the owner, Diane Love, Inc., did not file a required Section 8 declaration, and the mark is now listed as “dead.” The registration covered Class 018 handbags, Class 021 cups, pitchers, vases, tea pots, bowls, platters and figurines, Class 026 artificial flowers, and Class 031 dried scented flowers, all used in commerce since the early 1970s. A similar name used for any of those goods would create the closest record‑based concern, while uses outside those categories are farther from the scope shown. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “Diane Love.” No Supplemental Register filing appears, and the latest meaningful event is the Section 8 cancellation in 1987. The supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations beyond this or other enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to market comparable products under a similar name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.