Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for SEE-ME, serial 73276813, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
SEE-MESerial 73276813 · Principal Register
Dead · Withdrawn
Owner: Shifrin; Eugene M.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Filed May 12, 1981
The record shows that the mark “SEE‑ME” is dead, having been abandoned after publication because the applicant, Eugene M. Shifrin, filed an express abandonment. The mark was on the Principal Register and covered life‑saving apparatus in the nature of a reflective shield worn by pedestrians, bicyclists or joggers so that they can be visible at night. A similar name would raise the closest concern for products that are reflective safety gear or similar night‑visibility devices. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the wording “SEE‑ME”; it only applies to the specific goods listed. The prosecution history shows the mark was approved for publication, published for opposition, and then abandoned; no further maintenance or renewal events are recorded. No enforcement actions, oppositions, or cancellations appear in the supplied history. For someone considering a similar name, the visible risk is that using “SEE‑ME” for reflective safety gear could conflict with this abandoned mark’s prior claim in that narrow category.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.