Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for LILY PAD WATERBEDS, serial 73377108, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
LILY PAD WATERBEDSSerial 73377108 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: Lily Pad Waterbeds, Inc.
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Jul 29, 1982
Registered Jul 12, 1983
The record shows that “LILY PAD WATERBEDS” is a cancelled registration – the Principal Register entry (Reg. 1245657) was cancelled on September 14, 1990 because the owner, Lily Pad Waterbeds, Inc., did not file a required Section 8 declaration, and the record lists no later activity. The mark was limited to “Retail Waterbed Store Services” in class 042, so a name that is used for selling or servicing waterbeds would be the closest area of concern; uses in unrelated fields such as software or clothing would be farther from the scope shown here. The record does not give Lily Pad Waterbeds, Inc. control over every use of the words “Lily Pad” or “Waterbeds,” only over the specific retail‑service context recorded. There is no indication of oppositions, cancellations beyond the Section 8 lapse, or other enforcement actions in the supplied history. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a similar name for water‑related retail services, but the risk drops for dissimilar goods.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.