Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for SUENOS DE ORO, serial 73433035, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
SUENOS DE OROSerial 73433035 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: Starlux S.A.
Class 030 - Staple Foods
Filed Jul 05, 1983
Registered Jan 01, 1985
The record shows that SUENOS DE ORO is a cancelled Principal Register mark owned by Starlux S.A., a corporation organized in Spain; the registration was cancelled on April 2, 1991 because the owner failed to file a required Section 8 declaration. The only goods listed are “Tea Composed of Common Chamomile, Linden Flowers, Tea Mint, Penny Royal and Pollen” in International Class 030, so a similar name used for food‑related products—especially herbal teas—would raise the closest record‑based concern, while uses in unrelated categories would be farther from the scope shown. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “Suenos de Oro.” There is no Supplemental Register entry, and the prosecution history simply moves from approval for publication to registration and then cancellation, without any descriptiveness refusal or amendment. The latest meaningful event is the Section 8 cancellation in 1991, and the supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations by third parties, or other enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan a tea‑related brand with a similar name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.