Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for ESMERALDA, serial 73504221, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ESMERALDASerial 73504221 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: COMPANIA DE FOMENTO Y DESARROLLO, S.A.
Class 023 -
Filed Oct 17, 1984
Registered Dec 17, 1985
The record shows that the mark ESMERALDA was registered on the Principal Register to COMPANIA DE FOMENTO Y DESARROLLO, S.A., a Spanish corporation, for “yarns of natural and synthetic fibers or mixtures thereof in the form of balls and hanks for knitting” (International Class 023), but the registration was cancelled on July 31 1992 because the owner failed to file a required Section 8 declaration, so the mark is now dead and not enforceable. Because the only listed goods are knitting yarns, a similar name used for textile‑related products would be the closest area of concern, while uses in unrelated fields such as software, food, or services fall farther from the scope shown here. The prosecution history contains no oppositions, cancellations beyond the Section 8 lapse, or other enforcement actions, so the supplied history shows none. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern only if you plan to market yarns or similar knitting supplies under the same name; otherwise the record presents a limited, class‑specific risk.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.