Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for FLORES, serial 73608319, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
FLORESSerial 73608319 · Supplemental Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: MOPAR
Class 028 -
Filed Jul 07, 1986
Registered Jun 09, 1987
The record shows that the mark FLORES was registered on the Supplemental Register to MOPAR, a partnership organized in California, but the registration was cancelled on Dec 13, 1993 because the owner failed to file an acceptable Section 8 declaration, so the mark is now dead. The registration covered only class 028 goods—boxing gloves, protectors, headgear, bag gloves and heavy bags—so a later user of “Flores” for anything outside those sporting‑equipment items would face the closest record‑based concern in that narrow area. Because it sits on the Supplemental Register, the prosecution history reveals an initial final refusal in March 1987, an examiner’s amendment in April 1987, approval for Supplemental registration later that month, and eventual registration in June 1987; this sequence indicates the USPTO found the mark descriptive for the listed goods and placed it on the Supplemental Register rather than the Principal Register. The latest meaningful event is the Section 8 cancellation in 1993, and no oppositions, cancellations by third parties, or court actions appear in the supplied history. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan to market boxing‑related gear under a similar name, but the record does not extend to unrelated products or services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.