Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for 100% NATURAL BONE PUP CICLES YOUR DOG WILL LUV EM KEEP FROZEN MIN. WT. 3 LBS. NOT FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION, serial 73683232, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
100% NATURAL BONE PUP CICLES YOUR DOG WILL LUV EM KEEP FROZEN MIN. WT. 3 LBS. NOT FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTIONSerial 73683232 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: GRZEBYK, DAVID J.
Class 031 -
Filed Sep 08, 1987
The record shows the application for “100% NATURAL BONE PUP CICLES YOUR DOG WILL LUV EM KEEP FROZEN MIN. WT. 3 LBS. NOT FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION” was abandoned on August 8 1988 because the applicant failed to respond to an Office action, and the owner listed is David J. Grzebyk, an individual. The only goods listed are natural frozen “dog” bones in International Class 031, first used in commerce on April 21 1983. A similar name would raise the closest record‑based concern if used for frozen or otherwise natural dog‑bone products, since that is the precise scope the record covers. The abandonment means the USPTO record does not give the owner control over every use of the wording in other contexts or for other products. The prosecution history shows a non‑final action mailed on December 11 1987, assignment to an examiner on November 18 1987, and the final abandonment in August 1988; there are no oppositions, cancellations or court actions noted. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan to market frozen dog bones under a similar phrase, but the risk drops sharply for unrelated goods or services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.