Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for ORGAFLEX, serial 73701365, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ORGAFLEXSerial 73701365 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: ATOCHEM
Class 017 -
Filed Dec 16, 1987
Registered Aug 01, 1989
The record shows that ORGAFLEX, owned by ATOCHEM (a corporation organized in France), was registered on the Principal Register on August 1 1989 but was cancelled on February 5 1996 because the registrant failed to file an acceptable Section 8 declaration, so the mark is now dead. The registration covered only class 017, specifically “polyphosphazene polymers for use in the manufacture of flexible & rigid plastic foam for further use in a variety of industries as heat and sound insulation, padding and shielding, and other such uses.” A similar name would raise the closest concern if it were used for comparable polymer or foam products in those industrial applications; uses outside that narrow technical field are farther from the scope shown. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the word ORGAFLEX. The latest meaningful event is the Section 8 cancellation in 1996, and no opposition, cancellation proceeding, or other enforcement action appears in the history. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a name for related polymer or foam products, but the risk is limited to that specific technical area.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.