Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for CASIO, serial 73731106, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
CASIOSerial 73731106 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: CASIO KEISANKI KABUSHIKI KAISHA
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Filed May 27, 1988
Registered Feb 14, 1989
The record shows that the mark “CASIO” is live and registered on the Principal Register, owned by CASIO KEISANKI KABUSHIKI KAISHA, a corporation organized in Japan. The registration covers electrical and scientific apparatus in class 009, specifically LCD‑television sets, radio receivers, video tape recorders with LCD‑television sets, digital audio tape recorders, compact disc players, electronic still cameras, still cameras, pocket beepers, thermic copiers, facsimile transmitters and receivers, blank video cassette tapes and blank audio cassette tapes. A similar name would raise the closest concern for uses involving any of those items, especially electronic imaging or audio‑visual equipment. The record does not give control over every use of the word “CASIO.” The mark is on the Principal Register, so no supplemental examination sequence is shown. The latest status event is a renewal, with the status date of November 24, 2018. No oppositions, cancellations, or other enforcement actions appear in the supplied history. For someone considering a similar name, the presence of this active registration in class 009 suggests a meaningful risk of conflict if the new use involves comparable goods.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.