Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for STOUFFER ESMERALDA RESORT, serial 73748426, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
STOUFFER ESMERALDA RESORTSerial 73748426 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: STOUFFER CORPORATION, THE
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Aug 26, 1988
Registered Apr 11, 1989
The record shows that “STOUFFER ESMERALDA RESORT” is a cancelled Principal Register service mark owned by The Stouffer Corporation, an Ohio corporation, and it is no longer live as of the status date of November 14, 2009 when the registration was cancelled for failure to file a required Section 8 declaration. The registration covered Class 042 scientific and technology services specifically described as “hotel reservation services, including planning meetings and recreational packages for a designated hotel and/or resort,” so a similar name used for hotel‑booking, resort‑planning, or related travel‑service offerings would be the closest area of concern. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the words “Stouffer,” “Esmeralda,” or “Resort” in unrelated fields. The prosecution history shows the mark was approved, published for opposition, and ultimately registered on the Principal Register, but it never moved to the Supplemental Register. The latest meaningful event is the 2009 cancellation; no opposition, cancellation proceeding, or other enforcement activity appears in the supplied history. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to offer hotel‑reservation or resort‑planning services under a similar name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.