Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for SKINOREN, serial 73761417, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
SKINORENSerial 73761417 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: SCHERING AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
Class 005 - Pharmaceuticals
Filed Nov 02, 1988
Registered Jun 27, 1989
The record shows that SKINOREN is no longer active – it was cancelled on January 2 1996 because the registrant failed to file a required Section 8 declaration, and the USPTO lists the mark as “dead · cancelled.” The owner is SCHERING AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, a German corporation, and the registration covered only one class: Class 005 for pharmaceutical products, specifically “preparations for the topical treatment of acne.” A similar name used for acne‑related skin medicines would raise the closest record‑based concern, while uses in unrelated fields sit farther from the scope shown here. The record does not give SCHERING control over every possible use of the word SKINOREN. This mark was never placed on the Supplemental Register, so the prosecution history simply reflects its approval, publication, registration on the Principal Register, and eventual cancellation. The supplied history contains no oppositions, cancellations beyond the Section 8 event, or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a name in the acne‑treatment space, but the risk drops sharply for dissimilar goods or services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.