Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for POKEY, serial 73767349, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
POKEYSerial 73767349 · Principal Register
Dead · Expired
Owner: PREMA TOY CO., INC.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 020 -
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 028 -
Filed Dec 05, 1988
Registered Sep 22, 1992
The record shows that the mark “POKEY” was registered on the Principal Register in 1992 for a wide range of goods, including radios, phonographs, audio cassette players, decorative magnets, a large array of paper goods and stationery, clothing items such as night shirts and swim suits, and various toys like dolls, puzzles, and musical toys. The owner listed is PREMA TOY CO., INC., a California corporation. The mark’s status is dead because the registration was not renewed and has expired as of June 28 2003. Because the mark was on the Principal Register, the owner once held exclusive rights to use the name on those specific goods. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the word “POKEY” in other contexts. No opposition, cancellation, or enforcement activity appears in the supplied history. For someone considering a similar name, the closest concern would be using “POKEY” on similar electrical, paper, clothing, or toy products, where the expired registration still signals that the owner once claimed distinctiveness for those goods.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.