Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for CINDERELLA, serial 74020381, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
CINDERELLASerial 74020381 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: International Licensing Corporation
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Filed Jan 16, 1990
Registered Sep 15, 1992
The record shows that the “CINDERELLA” mark is cancelled, with the last status change on March 22 1999 when the registration was cancelled for failure to file a Section 8 declaration, and the owner listed is International Licensing Corporation, a California corporation. The registration covered only paper goods and printed matter—specifically notepads, envelopes, notebooks, lined writing paper and stationery in International Class 016—so a similar name used on those types of products would create the closest record‑based concern. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the word “Cinderella” in other categories or industries. This was a Principal Register registration, not a Supplemental Register filing, and the prosecution history reflects the usual steps of amendment, statement‑of‑use filing and eventual cancellation rather than any special supplemental treatment. No opposition, cancellation proceeding or other enforcement action appears in the history, so the supplied file shows no visible enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to market paper or stationery under a similar name, but the risk is far lower for unrelated goods or services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.