Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for GRUPPO FININVEST RETEITALIA, serial 74069529, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
GRUPPO FININVEST RETEITALIASerial 74069529 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: FINANZIARIA D'INVESTIMENTO - FININVEST S.P.A.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 038 - Communication Services
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Jun 14, 1990
The record shows that “GRUPPO FININVEST RETEITALIA” is dead – it was abandoned on September 25 1994 because the applicant never filed a required Statement of Use after the Notice of Allowance, and the history contains no later enforcement actions. The owner listed is FINANZIARIA D'INVESTIMENTO ‑ FININVEST S.P.A., a corporation organized in Italy. The application covered a wide range of goods and services, most notably Class 009 items such as motion‑picture equipment, cameras, televisions and audio‑video devices, Class 016 paper and printed matter like tickets and illustrated cards, Class 035 advertising and business consulting, Class 038 radio and television broadcasting, Class 041 education and entertainment services, and Class 042 scientific and technology consulting. A similar name would raise the closest concern in any of those listed areas, especially the media‑equipment and publishing categories, but the record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words. Because the mark was never moved to the Supplemental Register, the prosecution history simply reflects the standard sequence of extensions for a Statement of Use that ultimately was not filed. The last meaningful event is the abandonment entry on September 25 1994, and no opposition or cancellation filings appear. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to use the same wording in any of the listed classes.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.