Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for GRUPPO FINNVEST VIDEOTIME, serial 74069530, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
GRUPPO FINNVEST VIDEOTIMESerial 74069530 · Principal Register
Dead · Withdrawn
Owner: Finanziaria D'Investimento - Fininvest Spa
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 038 - Communication Services
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Jun 14, 1990
The record shows the mark GRUPPO FINNVEST VIDEOTIME is dead – it was expressly abandoned on July 2 1991 by the applicant Finanziaria D'Investimento ‑ Fininvest Spa, and no later maintenance activity appears. The abandoned application covered a wide range of goods and services, including motion‑picture films, cameras, video‑reproduction equipment, television sets and related accessories in Class 009; printed materials such as tickets, books and magazines in Class 016; advertising, business consulting and media production services in Classes 035, 038 and 041; and professional financial and technical consulting in Class 042. If you plan to use a similar name for products or services that fall within any of those categories, the record would be the closest point of concern. The filing does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “GRUPPO FINNVEST VIDEOTIME,” and the supplied history shows no opposition, cancellation or court action. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern for similar uses in the listed fields.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.