Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for GRUPPO FININVEST, serial 74069532, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
GRUPPO FININVESTSerial 74069532 · Principal Register
Dead · Withdrawn
Owner: FINANZIARIA D'INVESTIMENTO - FININVEST SPA
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 038 - Communication Services
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Jun 14, 1990
The record shows that GRUPPO FININVEST is an abandoned application—its status is “dead” after the applicant filed an express abandonment on April 27, 1992, and the owner listed is FINANZIARIA D'INVESTIMENTO ‑ FININVEST SPA, a corporation organized in Italy. The filing covered a wide range of goods and services, most notably Class 009 items such as motion‑picture films, cameras, television sets and related audio‑video equipment, Class 016 printed‑matter like tickets, illustrated cards and newspaper, Class 035 advertising and business consulting services, Class 038 radio and television broadcasting, Class 041 education and entertainment services including film production and athletic competitions, and Class 042 scientific and technology services like architectural consulting. Because the application never issued a registration, the record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “GRUPPO FININVEST,” but it does create a concrete concern for uses that fall within these listed categories. The prosecution history shows the application moved from approval for publication to a notice of allowance, then to abandonment, with no opposition or cancellation events recorded. No enforcement activity appears in the supplied history. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to use a similar name for products or services that overlap any of the classes listed.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.