Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for OPENCODE, serial 74072921, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
OPENCODESerial 74072921 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Open Software Foundation, Inc.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Filed Jun 26, 1990
The record shows that the mark OPENCODE is abandoned; the last status event was an abandonment on May 19 1992 after the applicant failed to respond to an Office action, and the owner listed is Open Software Foundation, Inc., a Delaware corporation. The application covered Class 009 goods described as operating system computer programs, graphical user interface computer programs, and various software for creating open, hardware‑neutral or distributed computing environments and for facilitating communication among computers; a similar name used for comparable software would be the closest area of concern. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the word “OPENCODE” in other fields or for unrelated products. Because the filing was on the Principal Register but never issued a registration, there is no supplemental‑register sequence to note. The prosecution history shows a final refusal mailed in September 1991, a non‑final action in December 1990, and the ultimate abandonment in May 1992, with no enforcement actions recorded. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to market software that overlaps the listed computer‑program descriptions.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.