Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for WORDLINE, serial 74167227, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
WORDLINESerial 74167227 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: LDB COMMUNICATION ET CONSEIL
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 028 -
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed May 16, 1991
The record shows that WORDLINE is an abandoned application – the USPTO marked it “dead” after the applicant, LDB COMMUNICATION ET CONSEIL, a French corporation, failed to respond to an Office action, with the abandonment dated April 9 1993. The filing covered a mix of goods and services: paper items such as note pads, notebooks, file folders and language‑training books; board games and handheld electronic game units; business consultation and personnel placement; educational classes in vocational, linguistic and translation training plus videotape production; and recruitment of translators and linguists. A similar name would raise the closest concern in any of those categories, especially the language‑training books, educational services, or translation‑recruitment work, because those are the specific areas the record lists. The abandonment means the USPTO does not grant the owner any exclusive right over the word “WORDLINE” in other fields, and the record contains no evidence of oppositions, cancellations or court actions. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan to use the name in comparable educational or translation‑related services, but the risk is lower for unrelated product lines.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.