Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for OPENODB, serial 74203926, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
OPENODBSerial 74203926 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: Hewlett-Packard Company
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Filed Sep 16, 1991
Registered Feb 23, 1993
The record shows that the mark OPENODB was registered on the Principal Register to Hewlett‑Packard Company but was cancelled on August 30, 1999 because the registrant failed to file an acceptable Section 8 declaration, so the registration is now dead. It covered “computer software for use in database management” in International Class 009, meaning the closest area of concern is any software that manages databases; a similar name used for unrelated goods or services would be farther from the scope shown here. The record does not give Hewlett‑Packard control over every possible use of the word OPENODB, only over the specific software described. The prosecution history shows the mark proceeded through normal examination, received a Notice of Allowance, and was allowed on the Principal Register before later being cancelled for non‑maintenance. The latest meaningful event is the Section 8 cancellation in 1999, and the supplied history contains no indication of oppositions, cancellations by third parties, or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan to use a similar name for database‑related software.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.