Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for MV MODUS VIVENDI, serial 74291663, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
MV MODUS VIVENDISerial 74291663 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: Shin Won Corporation
Class 014 -
Class 018 -
Filed Jul 02, 1992
Registered Aug 27, 1996
The record shows that MV MODUS VIVENDI is a cancelled Principal Register mark owned by Shin Won Corporation, with the cancellation dated May 31 2003 because the registrant failed to file a required Section 8 declaration; there is no current live registration. The registration covered Class 014 precious metals, stones and jewelry and Class 018 leather goods such as briefcases, handbags, travel bags, sports bags, garment bags, trunks and umbrellas, so a later use of the same wording on similar jewelry or leather accessories would raise the closest record‑based concern. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “MV Modus Viviendi” in unrelated fields. The prosecution history shows the mark moved through normal examination, received a Notice of Allowance, was allowed on the Principal Register, and later was cancelled for non‑filing of the Section 8 maintenance. No oppositions, cancellations beyond the Section 8 event, or court actions appear, so the supplied history shows no visible enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to market jewelry or leather goods under a similar name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.