Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for WILT CHAMBERLAIN'S, serial 74334566, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
WILT CHAMBERLAIN'SSerial 74334566 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: Wilt Chamberlain's Restaurants, Inc.
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Nov 25, 1992
Registered Aug 24, 1993
The record shows that “WILT CHAMBERLAIN'S” is a cancelled Principal Register mark owned by Wilt Chamberlain’s Restaurants, Inc., with the cancellation dated May 29 2004 because the required Section 8 declaration was not filed. The registration covered clothing – specifically T‑shirts and shorts – in International Class 025 and restaurant services in Class 042, both tied to a first use date of December 18 1990. A later applicant using a similar name for apparel or restaurant‑related offerings would run into the closest record‑based concern, while uses in unrelated fields would be farther from the scope shown here. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “WILT CHAMBERLAIN’S.” No Supplemental Register activity appears, and the prosecution history simply tracks the original filing, approval, and eventual cancellation. The supplied history contains no opposition, cancellation proceeding, or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a name in the same clothing or restaurant categories.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.