Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for SAMSUNG, serial 74363473, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
SAMSUNGSerial 74363473 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Class 007 -
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 011 -
Class 014 -
Class 037 -
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Feb 26, 1993
The record shows that the mark “SAMSUNG” was abandoned by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. on July 9 1994 because the applicant failed to respond to an Office action. The abandoned application covered a wide range of goods in classes 007, 009, 011, 014, 037, and 042, including engines, electrical and scientific apparatus, appliances, watches, and various services such as engineering and legal research. Because the mark is no longer live, it does not give the owner control over every use of the word “SAMSUNG,” but the abandoned filing still indicates that the owner once sought protection for those specific goods and services. The prosecution history shows a final refusal in December 1993 followed by a late abandonment in July 1994, with no subsequent maintenance events. No enforcement actions, oppositions, or cancellations appear in the supplied history. For someone considering a similar name, the closest concern would be in the same classes of engines, electrical devices, or related services, and the abandoned status means the owner no longer holds a registered claim, though prior intent may still raise caution.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.