Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for NIKE, serial 74384105, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
NIKESerial 74384105 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: NIKE, INC.
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 018 -
Filed Apr 29, 1993
Registered Dec 06, 1994
The record shows that the mark “NIKE” was registered on the Principal Register in 1994 for paper goods and printed matter, specifically binders, student planners, notebooks, portfolio covers, and bookbags or pouches for carrying school materials. The owner is NIKE, INC., a corporation organized in Oregon. The status is dead, having been cancelled on April 3 2020 because the registrant failed to file a Section 8 declaration. The cancellation is the most recent significant event. No opposition, extension, or court action appears in the supplied history, so there is no visible enforcement activity. Because the mark is cancelled, the record does not give the owner control over the word “NIKE” in any context; it only shows that the mark once covered those specific goods. A similar name used for other paper or school‑related items would raise the closest concern, while use in unrelated categories would be farther from the scope shown. For someone considering a similar name, the record suggests a meaningful risk if the name is used for comparable paper goods, but the cancellation means the owner no longer holds that protection.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.