Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for FLORES, serial 74405230, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
FLORESSerial 74405230 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: Flores S.A.R.L.
Class 029 - Meats & Processed Foods
Class 030 - Staple Foods
Class 032 - Light Beverages
Filed Jun 22, 1993
Registered Mar 28, 1995
The record shows that the “FLORES” mark, owned by Flores S.A.R.L., a French corporation, was registered on the Principal Register for a range of food items—meat, fish, fowl and game; meat extracts; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies; jams; eggs; milk; edible oils and fats; fruit preserves; salad dressings; coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, coffee substitutes, processed cereals, bread, pastries and candy; as well as beer, mineral and gaseous water and non‑alcoholic fruit drinks, juices and concentrates. The most direct concern for a new applicant would be any use that falls within those food and beverage categories, because the registration covered them specifically. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the word “Flores” outside those listed goods. The mark was cancelled on April 6 2002 after the registrant failed to file a required Section 8 declaration; no later maintenance or renewal dates appear, and the prosecution history shows only routine examination steps, not a Supplemental Register filing. The supplied history contains no oppositions, cancellations by third parties or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to market similar food or beverage products under the same name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.