Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for NOT TO US, O LORD, BUT TO THY NAME BE GIVEN GLORY, serial 74449979, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
NOT TO US, O LORD, BUT TO THY NAME BE GIVEN GLORYSerial 74449979 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: Sovereign Military Order of the Temple of Jerusalem, Inc., The
Class 200 -
Filed Oct 22, 1993
Registered Aug 01, 1995
The record shows that the mark “NOT TO US, O LORD, BUT TO THY NAME BE GIVEN GLORY” is cancelled, with the status “dead” as of Feb 13 2026, and the owner listed as Sovereign Military Order of the Temple of Jerusalem, Inc., a New Jersey corporation. The registration covered only one class (200) and was limited to “indicating membership in a Christian, patriotic, chivalric and fraternal order.” Because the goods and services are narrowly focused on membership identification for that type of organization, a similar phrase used by another fraternal, religious, or patriotic group would present the closest record‑based concern, while uses unrelated to membership or to those themes fall farther from the scope shown. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the wording in other contexts. This was a Principal Register registration, not a Supplemental Register filing, and the prosecution history shows routine renewals until the most recent meaningful event—a cancellation on Feb 13 2026 for failing to file an acceptable Section 8 declaration. No oppositions, cancellations, or court actions appear in the supplied history. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a name that signals membership in a similar order, but the risk is limited to that specific area.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.