Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for RAY - BAN UV INDEX, serial 74491644, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
RAY - BAN UV INDEXSerial 74491644 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: BAUSCH & LOMB INCORPORATED
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Feb 17, 1994
Registered Feb 13, 1996
The record shows that “RAY ‑ BAN UV INDEX” is a cancelled Principal Register service mark, with the cancellation recorded on November 16 2002 because the registrant, Bausch & Lomb Incorporated, failed to file an acceptable Section 8 declaration; the owner is listed as a corporation organized in New York. The registration covered a scientific‑technology service in class 042—specifically “promoting public awareness of ultra violet rays by providing a daily measurement.” A similar name would raise the closest concern if used for any service that informs the public about UV levels or related sun‑exposure information, because that is the exact scope the record protects. The record does not give Bausch & Lomb control over every possible use of the words “ray,” “ban,” or “UV index” in unrelated fields. This mark was never placed on the Supplemental Register, so the prosecution history simply reflects the normal path to registration and later cancellation. No opposition, cancellation proceeding, or other enforcement action appears in the supplied history. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern for anyone planning a UV‑awareness service under a similar name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.