Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for VAVOOM STYLE, serial 74499307, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
VAVOOM STYLESerial 74499307 · Principal Register
Dead · Withdrawn
Owner: Matrix Essentials, INc.
Class 003 - Cosmetics & Cleaning
Filed Mar 11, 1994
The record shows that VAVOOM STYLE is an abandoned application – it was filed by Matrix Essentials, Inc. on March 11 1994, published for opposition on December 27 1994, and the applicant filed an express abandonment on April 12 1995, which is the latest status event in the file. The only goods listed are hair‑care preparations such as mousse, gel, spray, pomades, shaping sprays and liquid shine, all in International Class 3 for cosmetics and cleaning. Because the filing covers only those specific hair‑care products, a similar name used for something outside that narrow scope would be a farther concern, while a name used on comparable hair‑care items would be the closest record‑based risk. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the word “STYLE” or “VAVOOM.” No opposition, cancellation or court activity appears in the history, so there are no visible enforcement signals. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a hair‑care brand with a similar name, but the risk drops sharply for unrelated goods or services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.