Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for VAROOM, serial 74589922, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
VAROOMSerial 74589922 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Motorhead Productions, Inc.
Class 014 -
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 021 -
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 029 - Meats & Processed Foods
Class 030 - Staple Foods
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Oct 24, 1994
The record shows that VAROOM is a dead application that was abandoned on May 29 1999 because no Statement of Use or extension was filed after the Notice of Allowance, and the owner listed is Motorhead Productions, Inc., an Illinois corporation. The filing covered a wide range of goods—including jewelry, plastic tableware, clothing such as jackets and T‑shirts, potato chips, sauces, amusement‑arcade services, restaurant services, and printed matter like auto‑racing books and posters—so a similar name used for any of those categories would create the closest record‑based concern. The record does not give Motorhead Productions control over every possible use of the word “VAROOM,” only over the specific items listed. This was a standard Principal Register filing; there is no Supplemental Register entry or descriptiveness refusal noted in the prosecution history. The latest meaningful event is the abandonment entry on May 29 1999, and the supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to use a similar name for comparable goods or services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.