Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for TULIP COLORBLENDS, TEXTUREBLENDS, COLORWAYS AND COLORWAVES, serial 74590834, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
TULIP COLORBLENDS, TEXTUREBLENDS, COLORWAYS AND COLORWAVESSerial 74590834 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: SCHIPPER, TIMOTHY
Class 031 -
Filed Oct 26, 1994
Registered Jan 30, 1996
The record shows the mark “TULIP COLORBLENDS, TEXTUREBLENDS, COLORWAYS AND COLORWAVES” was registered on the Principal Register to Timothy Schipper, an individual, for “living plants and live flowering plants and/or live flowering arrangements” (International Class 031), but the registration was cancelled on Nov 4 2006 because the required Section 8 declaration was not filed. Because the protection was limited to live plants and floral arrangements, a similar name used for anything outside that narrow horticultural scope would be the closest record‑based concern, while uses in unrelated categories (for example, software or apparel) are farther from the listed goods. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the word “Tulip” or the descriptive terms. No Supplemental Register filing appears, and the prosecution history simply moves from approval to registration and later cancellation. The supplied history contains no oppositions, cancellations by third parties, or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to market live plants under a comparable name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.