Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for DINOSKINS "IF IT'S NOT A DINOSKIN, IT'S JUST ANOTHER REPTILE, serial 74592438, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
DINOSKINS "IF IT'S NOT A DINOSKIN, IT'S JUST ANOTHER REPTILESerial 74592438 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: David Veilleus & Tony Jabar Partnership, The
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 024 -
Class 025 - Clothing
Filed Oct 31, 1994
The record shows that the mark “DINOSKINS “IF IT'S NOT A DINOSKIN, IT'S JUST ANOTHER REPTILE” is dead; it was abandoned on January 11, 1996 because the applicant failed to respond or filed a late response to an Office action. The owner listed is David Veilleus & Tony Jabar Partnership, The, a partnership organized in Maine. The abandoned application covered three classes: 016 for paper goods and printed matter such as books, stickers, and stationery; 024 for textiles and textile goods like bedding and table covers; and 025 for clothing, including a wide range of apparel and footwear. A similar name would raise the closest concern in those same categories, especially if the new use involves printed or textile products. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the wording, and there is no evidence of enforcement activity in the supplied history. The latest meaningful status event is the abandonment in 1996. For someone considering a similar name, the abandoned status suggests a lower risk, but the specific goods listed still present a focused area of potential concern.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.