Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for RAY BAN XRAYS SERIOUS SPORTS SUNGLASSES, serial 74625146, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
RAY BAN XRAYS SERIOUS SPORTS SUNGLASSESSerial 74625146 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Filed Jan 24, 1995
Registered Apr 08, 1997
The record shows the mark RAY BAN XRAYS SERIOUS SPORTS SUNGLASSES was registered on the Principal Register to Bausch & Lomb Incorporated but was cancelled on Jan 10 2004 because the registrant failed to file an acceptable Section 8 declaration, so the registration is now dead. It covered only “sunglasses and parts thereof, and accessories for sunglasses, namely sunglass cases” in International Class 009, so a later use of a similar name on eyewear or related accessories would raise the closest record‑based concern. The record does not give Bausch & Lomb control over every possible use of the words “Ray Ban” or “serious sports sunglasses” in other product categories. The prosecution history shows the mark moved through normal examination, received a Notice of Allowance, and was allowed on the Principal Register before its eventual cancellation; there is no indication of oppositions, cancellations by a third party, or other enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to market sunglasses or cases under a similar name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.