Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for DRAGON BALL Z, serial 74629504, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
DRAGON BALL ZSerial 74629504 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: KABUSHIKI KAISHA SHUEISHA, ALSO TRADING AS SHUEISHA INC.
Class 028 -
Filed Feb 03, 1995
Registered Jul 20, 1999
The record shows that “DRAGON BALL Z” is a cancelled Principal Register registration (status “dead”) owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA SHUEISHA, also trading as SHUEISHA INC., and the cancellation was entered on April 22 2006 because the registrant failed to file a required Section 8 declaration. The registration covered Class 028 goods described as electronic toys – specifically video‑game machines, handheld units for playing LDC and LED games, computer game software and video arcade game machines – with a first‑use claim of 1986 and a use‑in‑commerce claim of 1997. Because the protection was limited to those electronic‑toy items, a similar name used for unrelated products would be farther from the scope shown here, though the record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “Dragon Ball Z.” No Supplemental Register filing appears, and the latest meaningful event is the Section 8 cancellation in 2006; the prosecution history contains no oppositions, cancellations beyond that, or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan to market electronic‑toy or video‑game products under a similar name, but the risk is lower for dissimilar goods.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.