Status report

Get it in writing

The official USPTO status record for DRAGON BALL Z, serial 75049159, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.

INSTANT DELIVERY

Trademark Status Report

$7.99

The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.

  • Current status with a plain-English verdict
  • Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
  • The mark as it appears on the federal record
  • Every prosecution event, filing to today
  • Source-cited with the exact retrieval date

Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.

Payments launch soon. Leave your email and we'll tell you when this report is available.

Searching stays free, no account, no caps.

Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
DRAGON BALL Z
Serial 75049159 · Principal Register
Dead · Withdrawn

Owner: Saban Entertainment, Inc.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Filed Jan 26, 1996

The record shows that “DRAGON BALL Z” is not a live mark – it was abandoned on Nov 12 1996 after the applicant filed an express abandonment, and the owner listed is Saban Entertainment, Inc., a Delaware corporation. The only goods covered are in International Class 009 and include bicycle helmets, protective eyewear, eyeglasses and cases, CD‑ROMs, various electronic, multimedia and telecommunications apparatus, computer operating system software, prerecorded software, audio‑video tapes, records, audio‑video equipment, camera gear, radios, telephones, televisions, whistles and electronic diaries. Because the registration is limited to those technical and consumer‑electronics items, a similar name used for, say, a television series, clothing line or food product would be farther from the scope shown here, though the exact wording still appears in the USPTO database. The latest meaningful event is the express abandonment filing in November 1996, and the prosecution history contains no oppositions, cancellations or court actions, so the supplied history shows no enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a modest concern if you plan to market electronics or accessories under a similar name, but the record does not block all other uses of the words.

Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.

The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.

Your name deserves a straight answer.

Search the federal register free. No account, no caps, no waiting around.

Run a free trademark search