Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for GRUPPO FRATI, serial 75081224, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
GRUPPO FRATISerial 75081224 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: FRATI LUIGI S.p.A.
Class 001 -
Class 002 -
Class 006 -
Class 007 -
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 019 -
Class 020 -
Class 027 -
Filed Mar 29, 1996
Registered Apr 13, 1999
The record shows that “GRUPPO FRATI” is a cancelled Principal Register registration (Reg. No. 2237917) owned by FRATI LUIGI S.p.A.; the cancellation was entered on Jan 21 2006 because the required Section 8 declaration was not filed. The mark was originally registered for a wide range of industrial and commercial items, including chemicals for fire‑proofing and wood treatment (Class 001), paints, varnishes and wood preservatives (Class 002), metal building materials and hardware (Class 006), machine tools and related parts (Class 007), various paper, packaging and printed materials (Class 016), non‑metallic building panels and furniture (Classes 019‑020), and floor coverings such as carpets and mats (Class 027). A similar name used on products in any of those categories would be the closest record‑based concern, but the record does not give the owner control over all other uses of the words “GRUPPO” or “FRATI.” The prosecution history shows a normal examination, publication for opposition in 1999 and registration in 1999, followed by the later Section 8 cancellation; no oppositions, cancellations beyond this or court actions appear in the supplied history. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to use the same wording on comparable chemicals, paints, metal or building products.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.