Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for LOONEY TUNES LOVABLES, serial 75082189, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
LOONEY TUNES LOVABLESSerial 75082189 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P.
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Filed Apr 01, 1996
Registered Sep 23, 1997
The record shows the mark LOONEY TUNES LOVABLES is cancelled, having been removed from the Principal Register on June 26 2004 because the registrant failed to file a required Section 8 declaration, and the owner listed is Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P.; the registration covered Class 016 printed matter and paper goods, specifically items such as bulletin boards, comic books, magazines, greeting cards, collector’s trading cards, gift wrap, stationery, calendars, pens, pencils, crayons, party decorations and related paper products, all bearing characters from animated features. A similar name used on comparable printed‑matter items would raise the closest record‑based concern, while uses on unrelated goods or services fall farther from the scope shown here, but the record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the wording. The prosecution history shows the mark was approved for publication and registered on the Principal Register in 1997, with no supplemental‑register activity. The latest meaningful event is the Section 8 cancellation in 2004, and the supplied history contains no visible enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a comparable name on similar printed‑matter products.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.