Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for RIGGS & FORSYTHE SPECIALTY BEVERAGES LIMITED R & F RIGGS & FORSYTHE ESSE QUAM VIDERE, serial 75135990, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
RIGGS & FORSYTHE SPECIALTY BEVERAGES LIMITED R & F RIGGS & FORSYTHE ESSE QUAM VIDERESerial 75135990 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: Riggs & Forsythe Specialty Beverages Limited
Class 032 - Light Beverages
Filed Jul 18, 1996
Registered Mar 23, 1999
This record shows that the mark “RIGGS & FORSYTHE SPECIALTY BEVERAGES LIMITED R & F RIGGS & FORSYTHE ESSE QUAM VIDERE” was registered on the Principal Register on March 23, 1999, but the registration was cancelled on December 31, 2005 because the owner, Riggs & Forsythe Specialty Beverages Limited, did not file a required declaration under Section 8. The mark covered the class 032 goods of soft drinks, specifically light beverages. A similar name used for soft drinks or related beverage products would raise the closest record‑based concern, while use in unrelated categories would be farther from the scope shown. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the wording. The prosecution history shows a normal sequence of allowance, use amendments, and extensions, but no opposition or court actions are recorded. The latest meaningful event is the cancellation in 2005, and no enforcement activity appears in the supplied history. For someone considering a similar name, the cancelled status suggests the mark no longer protects that wording, but the prior registration still signals a potential risk if the name is used for soft drinks.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.