Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for NIKE, serial 75161019, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
NIKESerial 75161019 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Nike, Inc.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 028 -
Filed Aug 30, 1996
The record shows that the mark “NIKE” was abandoned and is no longer live. The owner listed is Nike, Inc., a corporation organized in Oregon, and the application was filed on August 30 1996 under an intent‑to‑use basis. The abandoned goods cover a wide range of sports equipment, including helmets, sports balls, protective gear, and various sporting accessories. A similar name would raise the closest concern in the sports equipment and apparel area, especially where the goods overlap with those listed. This record does not give the owner control over every use of the word “NIKE”; it only reflects the abandoned application’s scope. The prosecution history shows a Notice of Allowance issued on February 10 1998, followed by a Statement of Use extension granted on August 26 1998, but no use statement was filed, leading to abandonment on May 5 1999. No enforcement actions, oppositions, or cancellations appear in the supplied history. For someone considering a similar name, the abandoned status reduces the risk, but the broad sports‑equipment scope still suggests a meaningful concern if the new mark targets comparable goods.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.