Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for OPENNOW, serial 75196951, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
OPENNOWSerial 75196951 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: OpenNow Technologies, Inc.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Nov 12, 1996
The record shows that the mark OPENNOW is abandoned; the last status entry on Nov 5 1998 notes the applicant failed to respond to an Office action, and the application was never issued a registration. The owner listed is OpenNow Technologies, Inc., a California corporation, and the filing was based on an intent‑to‑use basis. The abandoned application covered computer‑software services for on‑line management of sales, customer and financial data (class 009), related training manuals, books and magazines (class 016), and maintenance of that software plus on‑line data‑management services (class 042). A similar name used for those same types of software or data‑management services would be the closest record‑based concern, but the record does not give the owner control over every use of the word “OPENNOW” in other fields. The prosecution history shows a non‑final action mailed in early 1997 and a final abandonment in late 1998, with no later maintenance filings or enforcement actions appearing in the file. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a comparable software‑or‑data service under a similar name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.