Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for LOONEY TUNES WB, serial 75235775, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
LOONEY TUNES WBSerial 75235775 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.
Class 025 - Clothing
Filed Feb 03, 1997
Registered Jun 29, 1999
The record shows that “LOONEY TUNES WB” is a live Principal Register registration owned by Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc., a Delaware corporation, and it has been renewed as of the July 10 2019 status date. The registration covers only Class 025 clothing – specifically shirts, T‑shirts, sweatshirts, jogging suits, jeans, shorts, tank tops, rainwear, bibs, skirts, blouses, dresses, suspenders, sweaters, jackets, coats, raincoats, snow suits, ties, robes, hats, caps, sun‑visors, belts, scarves, sleepwear, pajamas, lingerie, underwear, boots, shoes, sneakers, sandals, booties, slipper socks, swimwear and masquerade or Halloween costumes and masks sold in connection therewith. Because the protection is limited to those apparel items, a similar name used for unrelated goods such as food, software or entertainment services would be farther from the scope shown here, though the record does not block every possible use of the wording. The latest meaningful event is the renewal reflected in the July 2019 status update; no future dates are listed. The prosecution history is empty, and the supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan clothing under a comparable name, but the risk drops sharply for other product categories.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.