Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for NOVAFLUID, serial 75275400, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
NOVAFLUIDSerial 75275400 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Separex, S.A.
Class 007 -
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Filed Apr 16, 1997
The record shows that the mark “NOVAFLUID” is dead, having been abandoned because the owner, Separex, S.A., failed to file a Statement of Use or an Extension Request after the Notice of Allowance was issued. The mark was filed on April 16, 1997 and was allowed on October 13, 1998, but the abandonment was recorded on April 14, 2000. The goods covered are machines and scientific apparatus used for extracting, purifying, fractionating, and processing pharmaceuticals, aromas, oils, glasses, polymers, metals, cosmetics, composites, and food products with liquified gases or supercritical fluids, under classes 007 and 009. A similar name would raise the closest concern in those same technical fields, especially for equipment that uses supercritical fluids. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the wording; it only reflects rights that were once sought for those specific goods. No enforcement actions appear in the supplied history. For someone considering a similar name, the abandoned status reduces the risk, but the technical scope of the original application still suggests a potential concern if the new use is in the same industry.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.