Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for SAMSUNG, serial 75285225, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
SAMSUNGSerial 75285225 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: SAMSUNG CORPORATION
Class 002 -
Class 004 -
Class 005 - Pharmaceuticals
Class 018 -
Class 020 -
Class 022 -
Class 028 -
Class 038 - Communication Services
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed May 02, 1997
The record shows that the mark “SAMSUNG” was abandoned by Samsung Corporation, a corporation organized in Korea, after the applicant failed to file a Statement of Use or an Extension Request following the Notice of Allowance issued on August 24 1999. The abandoned application covered a wide range of goods, including paints, pigments, dyes, industrial oils, pharmaceuticals, leather goods, sporting equipment, and various communication and entertainment services. Because the mark was never registered, it does not give the owner exclusive rights to the word “SAMSUNG” in any context, but the record indicates that a similar name could raise the closest concern for uses in the same or closely related classes—particularly in industrial chemicals, pharmaceuticals, or consumer goods. The prosecution history shows a standard sequence of extensions and a final abandonment; no enforcement actions, oppositions, or cancellations appear in the supplied history. For someone considering a similar name, the record suggests a meaningful risk of encountering a prior‑use claim in the classes listed, though the mark itself is not enforceable.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.