Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for POKEY-PAC, serial 75286038, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
POKEY-PACSerial 75286038 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: GARRETSON, JOHN E.
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Filed May 05, 1997
Registered Feb 23, 1999
The record shows that the mark “POKEY‑PAC” was registered on the Principal Register on February 23, 1999, but it was cancelled on November 26, 2005 because the owner, John E. Garretson, failed to file a required declaration under Section 8. The mark covered commercial packaging, specifically paper boxes for food, as listed in class 016. A similar name used for paper food packaging would raise the closest concern, while use in unrelated goods or services would be farther from the scope shown. The cancellation means the mark no longer provides nationwide protection, but it does not erase any prior rights that might still exist in other jurisdictions or for other goods. The prosecution history shows a straightforward allowance and registration process with no opposition or amendment beyond the initial use amendment. No enforcement actions are recorded in this file. For someone considering a similar name, the cancelled status reduces the risk, yet the specific packaging context remains a potential point of concern.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.