Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for PEONY, serial 75303089, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
PEONYSerial 75303089 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: Beijing Peony Electronic Group Co.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Filed Jun 04, 1997
Registered Jul 28, 1998
The record shows that the mark “PEONY” is no longer active; it was cancelled on May 1 2005 because the registrant failed to file a Section 8 declaration. The owner listed is Beijing Peony Electronic Group Co., a corporation organized in China. The mark was registered on the Principal Register in class 009 for televisions, with first use in March 1991 and use in commerce by October 1993. Because the cancellation was due to a maintenance failure, the mark does not currently confer any rights, but the history indicates that the owner once claimed protection for that specific product. A similar name used for televisions or related electrical and scientific apparatus could raise the closest record‑based concern, while use in unrelated goods or services would be farther from the scope shown. The supplied history shows no opposition, cancellation after publication, or court action, so there is no visible enforcement activity. For someone considering a similar name, the cancelled status reduces the risk, but the past registration for televisions still suggests a potential concern if the new use is in that area.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.