Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for ITALY MODA GV ITALY MODA GRUPPO V: BY VITAGLIANO, serial 75313662, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ITALY MODA GV ITALY MODA GRUPPO V: BY VITAGLIANOSerial 75313662 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: GRUPPO V S.r.l.
Class 018 -
Class 024 -
Class 025 - Clothing
Filed Jun 23, 1997
Registered Nov 16, 1999
The record shows that the mark “ITALY MODA GV ITALY MODA GRUPPO V: BY VITAGLIANO” was registered on the Principal Register (Reg. No. 2291927) to GRUPPO V S.r.l., a joint‑stock company organized in Italy, but it was cancelled on Aug. 19, 2006 because the owner failed to file an acceptable Section 8 declaration, so the registration is now dead. The cancellation covers goods in classes 018 (leather and imitation‑leather items such as handbags, wallets and umbrellas), 024 (textile products like towels, bed sheets and table covers) and 025 (clothing and footwear including jackets, jeans, shoes and hats). A similar name used for any of those types of products would create the closest record‑based concern, while uses outside those categories are farther from the scope shown. The prosecution history contains no oppositions, cancellations beyond the Section 8 event, or other enforcement actions, so the supplied history shows none. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to market leather goods, textiles or apparel under a comparable name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.