Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for BDE BANDAI DIGITAL ENTERTAINMENT, serial 75380177, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
BDE BANDAI DIGITAL ENTERTAINMENTSerial 75380177 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Bandai Digital Entertainment Corporation
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Oct 27, 1997
The record shows the application for “BDE BANDAI DIGITAL ENTERTAINMENT” is dead, having been abandoned on Jan 20 1999 because the applicant failed to respond to an Office action; the owner listed is Bandai Digital Entertainment Corporation, a Delaware corporation. The filing covered class 042 services, specifically providing access to a computer database for playing interactive video games, on‑line facilities for real‑time interaction about general‑interest topics, on‑line educational information on health, home improvement, cooking, business computing news and many other subjects, plus on‑line mail‑order catalog services featuring new media, travel, recreation, magazine subscriptions and family‑oriented products. A similar name used in the same class of scientific and technology services would be the closest record‑based concern, but the record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the wording in other classes or contexts. The prosecution history shows only examiner assignments and a non‑final action before the abandonment, with no indication of a Supplemental Register filing. The supplied history contains no visible enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a comparable mark in the same tech‑service space.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.