Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for WHITE'S PORK CHOP TOPPER, serial 75409368, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
WHITE'S PORK CHOP TOPPERSerial 75409368 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: White's Family Kitchens, Inc.
Class 030 - Staple Foods
Filed Dec 22, 1997
Registered Oct 05, 1999
The record shows that “WHITE'S PORK CHOP TOPPER” was a cancelled registration on the Principal Register, owned by White's Family Kitchens, Inc., a corporation organized in Illinois. The mark covered sauces under class 030, specifically staple foods, with use in commerce beginning May 29, 1998. Because the mark is dead, it no longer provides enforceable rights, but the history indicates that the owner once held protection for that specific description of a pork‑chop topping sauce. A similar name would raise the closest concern if it applied to sauces or related staple food products, especially those marketed as pork‑chop toppers. The record does not create control over every use of the wording, and the cancellation was due to a failure to file a Section 8 declaration in 2006. No opposition, cancellation, or court action appears in the supplied history, so there is no visible enforcement activity. For someone considering a similar name, the main risk is that the mark was once registered for a comparable product, so using the same phrase for a pork‑chop topping sauce could still invite scrutiny.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.